The male imagines that GOD is a man.
The female imagines that GOD is a man.

The fact that the GODDESS was first is a problem for the male.

The fact that the GODDESS was first is a problem for the female.

Embedded within the realm of their imaginations ~that GOD is a male~ stems all the way back to childhood where their ability to use reason and logic were blocked by intellectual immaturity. Further, explorations indicate that this male and this female have been programmed to see this image as totally unlike themselves---->also a leftover trait from childhood.

Of course, men and women react differently to e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g! Men react logically/analytically to religion. Females react emotionally to religion. The emotional attachment to a male GOD is the epitome of the females' psycho-viscera. Males ~being intellectual thinkers~ rather than emotional thinkers look to the Bible for confirmation of a male GOD. Both perspectives are, however, jaded.

For if this male and this female carefully took the time to research their own peoples' dynastic history rather than the European version of "the lying lore of Christianity" they both would soon discover that:

Ma'at Lives 4Ever
Divinity/Salvation Come From Within
The Journey 2 GOD is Individual

[Centered]Ma'at - Hetep[/Centered]

Hey if its a problem for Christianity...what is it for Islam?? Both have the same type of ideology. We may as well discuss the entire Judeo-Christian belief system and European and Middle Eastern culture.